This news report is curated with insights from multiple reliable news sources.
Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, a sitting judge of the Allahabad High Court, has once again stirred public discourse with his polarizing remarks. Speaking at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) event on “Uniform Civil Code: A Constitutional Necessity,” the judge delved into themes ranging from constitutional obligations to spiritual metaphors, with a few eyebrow-raising statements that sent the internet abuzz.
Uniform Civil Code or the ‘Majority Code’?
Justice Shekhar Yadav passionately declared that India must be governed by the “majority’s will.” He took an oath (yes, in public) that the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) would soon be implemented, attributing this to the sacrifices of ancestors who worked to build a Ram Temple. He even encouraged attendees to stay resolute in making India the “Vishwa Guru,” an aspiration he firmly believed could only be led by Hindus.
Yadav passionately declared that India must be governed by the “majority’s will.” He took an oath (yes, in public) that the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) would soon be implemented, attributing this to the sacrifices of ancestors who worked to build a Ram Temple. He even encouraged attendees to stay resolute in making India the “Vishwa Guru,” an aspiration he firmly believed could only be led by Hindus.
However, his rhetoric didn’t stop there. Justice Yadav suggested that practices like polygyny and halal in Islam are relics of the past, contrasting them with Hinduism’s progressiveness, citing the abolition of practices like sati and untouchability.
When ‘Cows Breathing Oxygen’ Became the National Debate
This isn’t the first time Justice Yadav has made headlines. His 2021 ruling declaring cows to be national treasures went viral after he stated that “scientists believe cows inhale and exhale oxygen.” The judge also extolled the virtues of panchgavya (a concoction of cow products), attributing it to curing incurable diseases and even summoning rain via yajnas.
His faith in bovine supremacy was captured with, “When cows prosper, India prospers.”
A Unifying Spirit or a Polarizing Tone?
During his recent address, Justice Yadav used an infamous slur while discussing Islamic practices and linked religious education in Muslim communities to a lack of tolerance. “How can children who witness animal slaughter grow up to be kind?” he rhetorically questioned. He also drew comparisons between India’s potential and nations like Bangladesh and Afghanistan, suggesting dire outcomes if the “Hindu spirit” diminishes.
Justice Yadav’s choice of words, such as likening current political strategies to the propaganda tactics of Nazi ideologue Joseph Goebbels, was met with both shock and applause, depending on one’s ideological alignment.
Praises for PM Modi and Global Appearances
Justice Yadav has previously lauded Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his governance, including the free COVID-19 vaccination campaign. He also urged the PM to delay the 2022 Uttar Pradesh elections to safeguard public health during the Omicron wave.
Recently, at the Attlee Hall in the UK Parliament, Yadav represented India as a keynote speaker, painting a picture of a resilient Bharat rooted in cultural values. He introduced himself as a son of the land where the Ganges flows, the cow is sacred, and the Bhagavad Gita serves as moral scripture. His speech was interspersed with commendations of India’s progress under PM Modi’s leadership.
Satire or Seriousness? The Dichotomy of Justice Yadav’s Statements
Justice Yadav’s remarks oscillate between constitutional interpretations and cultural assertions, leaving the public amused and divided. Critics argue that his speeches blur the lines between judicial impartiality and personal ideology, while his supporters hail him as a voice unafraid to embrace India’s cultural heritage.
Whether it’s cows exhaling oxygen, advocating for the UCC, or drawing parallels to historical propagandists, Justice Yadav has ensured one thing: his words won’t go unnoticed. The next time he speaks, the nation will be watching (and fact-checking).
