The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms (CJAR) has raised serious concerns about a speech delivered by Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav of the Allahabad High Court at a Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) event. In a formal letter to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna on December 10, CJAR urged the constitution of an in-house inquiry and immediate suspension of Justice Yadav’s judicial duties.
Allegations of Communal Remarks and Judicial Impropriety
CJAR’s complaint alleges that Justice Yadav’s speech contained “unpardonable slurs” against the Muslim community, which it described as “unconscionable” and damaging to the integrity of his judicial office. The organization argued that such statements violate constitutional principles, including Articles 14, 21, 25, and 26, as well as the Preamble’s secular ideals.
The letter emphasized that Justice Yadav’s conduct at a politically-aligned event compromised the judiciary’s independence, impartiality, and credibility. CJAR noted, “His participation and statements grossly undermine public confidence in the judiciary and breach his oath to uphold the Constitution.”
Violation of Judicial Codes
The complaint outlined several violations of the “Restatement of Values of Judicial Life” adopted by the Supreme Court in 1997, which sets ethical guidelines for judges. Key principles allegedly breached include:
- Judges must maintain impartiality and refrain from actions that erode public trust in the judiciary.
- Judges should avoid political debates or public commentary on sensitive issues.
- Judges are required to uphold the dignity of their office through consistent and non-partisan behavior.
Calls for Action
CJAR demanded the withdrawal of Justice Yadav’s judicial responsibilities while the inquiry is underway, citing his inability to act with fairness and neutrality. The letter stated, “Justice Yadav’s actions raise doubts about his fitness to serve as a judge in a constitutional court.”
The organization also highlighted that the speech has sparked widespread concern, warranting a “strong institutional response” to preserve the judiciary’s credibility.
The Broader Impact
This controversy comes at a time when the judiciary’s independence is under heightened scrutiny. Justice Yadav’s statements, made in a public forum with political undertones, have ignited debates on the accountability of judges in safeguarding constitutional values.
CJAR’s call for action underscores the need for an impartial judiciary that commands public trust and adheres to its ethical obligations. The CJI’s response to these demands will likely set a precedent for how such issues are addressed in the future.
This news report is curated with insights from multiple reliable news sources.
