Rahul Gandhi’s recent article in The Indian Express, comparing monopolistic practices in modern Indian business to the historical exploitation by the East India Company, has sparked controversy. In his article, Gandhi highlighted how India was oppressed not by business strength but monopolistic control, referencing how the East India Company allegedly gained power by co-opting “pliant maharajas and nawabs.” This commentary led to strong reactions from members of former royal families, many of whom are now affiliated with the BJP, who viewed the comments as disparaging and historically inaccurate.
Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia, a descendant of the Scindia royal family, accused Gandhi of lacking respect for India’s heritage, calling his remarks an “insult” to leaders like Mahadji Scindia and others who opposed colonial rule. Similarly, Diya Kumari, Rajasthan’s Deputy Chief Minister and a descendant of the Jaipur royal family, criticized Gandhi for maligning India’s royal heritage. BJP MLA Vishvaraj Singh Mewar of the Mewar royal family and Mysore MP Yaduveer Wadiyar echoed similar sentiments, suggesting Gandhi’s views display an oversimplified understanding of the historical contributions of princely states toward India’s unity and culture.
In response to these critiques, Gandhi clarified that he supports businesses but opposes monopolies and oligopolies. He argued that his stance is against concentrated power in the hands of a few corporations, comparing it to colonial practices. Congress spokespersons like Pawan Khera defended Gandhi’s statements, suggesting Scindia’s connection to royal heritage might bias his view on the monopolistic analogy in Gandhi’s article. Congress also emphasized that India is now governed by a democratic Constitution, underscoring the need for equality over historical power hierarchies.
This debate underscores a clash over interpretations of India’s colonial past and current economic policies. Gandhi advocated for decentralized economic power, while royal descendants emphasised their historical legacy in defending India’s cultural identity and sovereignty.
