The Supreme Court of India has ruled decisively against petitions seeking the removal of the words “Socialist” and “Secular” from the Preamble of the Constitution. The Court upheld the terms as essential to the Constitution’s core structure, rejecting claims that their inclusion in the 42nd Amendment of 1976 lacked public approval or legislative debate.
In a strong affirmation of India’s democratic principles, Justice Sanjiv Khanna provided a nuanced interpretation of the terms ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ embedded in the Constitution. He emphasized that “Socialism” ensures equality of opportunity, equitable distribution of resources, and the welfare of all citizens, particularly the marginalized. On the other hand, “Secularism,” according to Justice Khanna, signifies the peaceful coexistence of diverse religions, where the state remains neutral and refrains from interfering in religious matters. This interpretation reflects the distinct Indian approach to governance, which embraces pluralism and inclusivity as cornerstones of democracy. Justice Khanna stressed that these ideals are integral to fostering harmony and promoting justice in a diverse society like India. By reaffirming the importance of ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ values, the judgment underscores their role in upholding constitutional morality, ensuring social justice, and preserving India’s identity as a vibrant, democratic nation committed to unity in diversity.
The ruling also dismissed the argument that these terms impose ideological constraints, emphasizing that the Preamble’s language is consistent with the nation’s evolving social and cultural context. The judgment solidifies the Supreme Court’s role in preserving the fundamental values of India’s democratic framework.
